https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399696 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents. The court found no merit in the petitioners' arguments, emphasizing the importance of preventing GST evasion. It held that the actions taken by the respondents were in line with the Act's provisions to combat tax evasion. The court highlighted the necessity of auditing processes and document seizure to ascertain tax liabilities. It concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the petitioners' claims of arbitrary conduct, warranting no grounds for judicial review at that stage. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399696 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents. The court found no merit in the petitioners' arguments, emphasizing the importance of preventing GST evasion. It held that the actions taken by the respondents were in line with the Act's provisions to combat tax evasion. The court highlighted the necessity of auditing processes and document seizure to ascertain tax liabilities. It concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the petitioners' claims of arbitrary conduct, warranting no grounds for judicial review at that stage. Case-Laws GST Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399696