https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290784 Interest on arrears of rent was held to be distinct from rent and outside the statutory definition of rent under the Bengal Tenancy Act; a suit confined to recovery of such interest was therefore not maintainable as a suit for rent. Revisional interference was available because no appeal lay from the decision of the Court of Appeal below, and the High Court set aside the concurrent decisions and dismissed the suit. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:52:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290784 Interest on arrears of rent was held to be distinct from rent and outside the statutory definition of rent under the Bengal Tenancy Act; a suit confined to recovery of such interest was therefore not maintainable as a suit for rent. Revisional interference was available because no appeal lay from the decision of the Court of Appeal below, and the High Court set aside the concurrent decisions and dismissed the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290784