<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 622 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399648</link>
    <description>The High Court found the ITAT&#039;s decision to be perverse and not based on the evidence, emphasizing the need for considering all relevant evidence and providing cogent reasons. The High Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s order and restored the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, which was supported by thorough consideration of the evidence. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with substantial questions of law answered in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 622 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399648</link>
      <description>The High Court found the ITAT&#039;s decision to be perverse and not based on the evidence, emphasizing the need for considering all relevant evidence and providing cogent reasons. The High Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s order and restored the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, which was supported by thorough consideration of the evidence. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with substantial questions of law answered in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>