<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to vacate the addition of Rs. 81,72,24,557. It held that the provision for diminution in the value of investments, disallowed in a prior assessment year, could not be taxed again to prevent double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal principles to ensure accurate tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to vacate the addition of Rs. 81,72,24,557. It held that the provision for diminution in the value of investments, disallowed in a prior assessment year, could not be taxed again to prevent double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal principles to ensure accurate tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>