<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 610 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, affirming that the amount received under the post decretal agreement constituted capital gains. However, the Tribunal permitted the deduction of certain expenses, including legal and watch and ward expenses, from the amount received to compute taxable capital gains. The decision underscored the necessity of accounting for relevant expenses in determining the fair tax liability assessment for such transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 610 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, affirming that the amount received under the post decretal agreement constituted capital gains. However, the Tribunal permitted the deduction of certain expenses, including legal and watch and ward expenses, from the amount received to compute taxable capital gains. The decision underscored the necessity of accounting for relevant expenses in determining the fair tax liability assessment for such transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>