<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 594 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399620</link>
    <description>Where extensive amendments would unduly delay a long-pending company petition, the NCLT may exercise its inherent powers to permit withdrawal with liberty to refile in order to advance expeditious disposal. The Tribunal preferred withdrawal over a detailed amendment exercise because repeated corrections would have prolonged the proceedings and undermined efficient adjudication. Withdrawal with liberty was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 594 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399620</link>
      <description>Where extensive amendments would unduly delay a long-pending company petition, the NCLT may exercise its inherent powers to permit withdrawal with liberty to refile in order to advance expeditious disposal. The Tribunal preferred withdrawal over a detailed amendment exercise because repeated corrections would have prolonged the proceedings and undermined efficient adjudication. Withdrawal with liberty was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>