<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that the recovery of tax liability, interest, and penalty lacked legal authority. The appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India was allowed, with the Tribunal affirming that the amendments to section 65(105) did not retroactively create &#039;exempted services,&#039; thus not justifying restrictions on CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that the recovery of tax liability, interest, and penalty lacked legal authority. The appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India was allowed, with the Tribunal affirming that the amendments to section 65(105) did not retroactively create &#039;exempted services,&#039; thus not justifying restrictions on CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>