<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (2) TMI 9 - SIND COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290779</link>
    <description>A recurring life allowance paid in consideration of long services rendered was treated as taxable income, not a capital sum or windfall. The payment was held to fall within the statutory concept of income and, more specifically, the inclusive definition of salary, which extends to annuity, pension, gratuity, fees, commissions, perquisites, or profits in lieu of or in addition to salary or wages. As no applicable exemption was shown, the monthly allowance was assessable to income tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (2) TMI 9 - SIND COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290779</link>
      <description>A recurring life allowance paid in consideration of long services rendered was treated as taxable income, not a capital sum or windfall. The payment was held to fall within the statutory concept of income and, more specifically, the inclusive definition of salary, which extends to annuity, pension, gratuity, fees, commissions, perquisites, or profits in lieu of or in addition to salary or wages. As no applicable exemption was shown, the monthly allowance was assessable to income tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>