<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1690 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290770</link>
    <description>Exemption eligibility under Notification No. 3/2000-ST for activities said to fall under Government of India schemes required proper examination, and the orders below had not adequately considered that claim. Following earlier Tribunal decisions involving the same appellant on similar remand issues, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication after due consideration of the notification claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1690 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290770</link>
      <description>Exemption eligibility under Notification No. 3/2000-ST for activities said to fall under Government of India schemes required proper examination, and the orders below had not adequately considered that claim. Following earlier Tribunal decisions involving the same appellant on similar remand issues, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication after due consideration of the notification claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>