<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290775</link>
    <description>A Section 9 petition seeking to restrain termination of a software licence agreement was analysed on the basis that the contract was determinable on notice for breach. The stated legal position is that a determinable commercial contract is not ordinarily specifically enforceable, and interim injunction cannot be granted to prevent its termination when damages are an adequate remedy. The commentary also notes that termination of the agreement did not by itself make the Section 9 petition infructuous, but interim protection still depended on the enforceability of the underlying contract. The merits of the alleged breach were left to the arbitral forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290775</link>
      <description>A Section 9 petition seeking to restrain termination of a software licence agreement was analysed on the basis that the contract was determinable on notice for breach. The stated legal position is that a determinable commercial contract is not ordinarily specifically enforceable, and interim injunction cannot be granted to prevent its termination when damages are an adequate remedy. The commentary also notes that termination of the agreement did not by itself make the Section 9 petition infructuous, but interim protection still depended on the enforceability of the underlying contract. The merits of the alleged breach were left to the arbitral forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>