https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290759 A matter directly and substantially in issue between the same parties, once heard and finally decided, cannot be reopened on the ground that the earlier reasoning was erroneous in law or fact. The prior determination that the tenant was bound by the kabuliyat to pay interest on arrears of rent therefore operated as res judicata. The contractual interest remained binding, and it was also required to be included as an incident of the rent dispute when computing the suit value for the statutory bar to second appeal. The objection to maintainability failed, and the trial court decree was restored with costs. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290759 A matter directly and substantially in issue between the same parties, once heard and finally decided, cannot be reopened on the ground that the earlier reasoning was erroneous in law or fact. The prior determination that the tenant was bound by the kabuliyat to pay interest on arrears of rent therefore operated as res judicata. The contractual interest remained binding, and it was also required to be included as an incident of the rent dispute when computing the suit value for the statutory bar to second appeal. The objection to maintainability failed, and the trial court decree was restored with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Sep 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290759