https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290753 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is wide, but it cannot be used to recast contractual relations between parties. Where the dispute concerned seizure and auction steps under the State Financial Corporations Act, the High Court should have confined itself to the legality of that action. By directing a fresh loan, waiver of balance dues, and waiver of interest, it went beyond the writ challenge and effectively introduced terms of a new contract. The SC held that such relief exceeded jurisdiction and the orders were unsustainable. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:32:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290753 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is wide, but it cannot be used to recast contractual relations between parties. Where the dispute concerned seizure and auction steps under the State Financial Corporations Act, the High Court should have confined itself to the legality of that action. By directing a fresh loan, waiver of balance dues, and waiver of interest, it went beyond the writ challenge and effectively introduced terms of a new contract. The SC held that such relief exceeded jurisdiction and the orders were unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290753