<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confiscation of Goods and Vehicle Requires Reasoning u/s 130 CGST Act; Lack of Reasons Suggests Invalid Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55158</link>
    <description>Confiscation of goods alongwith vehicle - Section 130 of the CGST Act - As is well settled in law, the absence of reasons by an adjudicating authority in the order passed by him would suggest a non application of mind by the adjudicating authority and the presumption to be drawn by the reviewing court is that the adjudicating authority did not have any reason to give. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:27:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confiscation of Goods and Vehicle Requires Reasoning u/s 130 CGST Act; Lack of Reasons Suggests Invalid Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55158</link>
      <description>Confiscation of goods alongwith vehicle - Section 130 of the CGST Act - As is well settled in law, the absence of reasons by an adjudicating authority in the order passed by him would suggest a non application of mind by the adjudicating authority and the presumption to be drawn by the reviewing court is that the adjudicating authority did not have any reason to give. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:27:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>