https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290748 A dispute over the insurer's disclaimer and alleged abandonment of a claim fell within the arbitration clause because its resolution required construction and application of the policy terms; the arbitrator therefore had jurisdiction. The Court also held that the validity of the award could not be examined in pending section 33 proceedings where the application predated the award and did not seek relief against it, and objections to the award had to be taken in the proper proceeding. The appeal failed, as the reference was valid and the award challenge lay outside the scope of the section 33 application. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:26:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290748 A dispute over the insurer's disclaimer and alleged abandonment of a claim fell within the arbitration clause because its resolution required construction and application of the policy terms; the arbitrator therefore had jurisdiction. The Court also held that the validity of the award could not be examined in pending section 33 proceedings where the application predated the award and did not seek relief against it, and objections to the award had to be taken in the proper proceeding. The appeal failed, as the reference was valid and the award challenge lay outside the scope of the section 33 application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290748