<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399590</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the deduction under Section 10A for the &#039;deemed export&#039; of Rs. 1,23,66,641/-. The court held that the provisions of the SEZ Act, including the concept of &#039;deemed export,&#039; should be considered when applying Section 10A. The court distinguished a previous decision that did not consider the SEZ Act&#039;s provisions and where the receipt was in Indian currency. The issue of telecommunication expenditure amounting to Rs. 17,09,510/- was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399590</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the deduction under Section 10A for the &#039;deemed export&#039; of Rs. 1,23,66,641/-. The court held that the provisions of the SEZ Act, including the concept of &#039;deemed export,&#039; should be considered when applying Section 10A. The court distinguished a previous decision that did not consider the SEZ Act&#039;s provisions and where the receipt was in Indian currency. The issue of telecommunication expenditure amounting to Rs. 17,09,510/- was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>