<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 544 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399570</link>
    <description>A foreign arbitral award could be relied upon to support an operational debt in a section 9 insolvency petition, and the absence of completed separate enforcement proceedings did not defeat the claim. Objections raised in arbitration were not treated as a live pre-existing dispute because the award had already addressed them and no recognised challenge remained pending. The petition was also held to be duly authorised on the basis of the board resolution and power of attorney. Default was established through the debt, demand notice, non-payment, and arbitral award, so the petition was admitted and CIRP, including the statutory moratorium, was triggered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 544 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399570</link>
      <description>A foreign arbitral award could be relied upon to support an operational debt in a section 9 insolvency petition, and the absence of completed separate enforcement proceedings did not defeat the claim. Objections raised in arbitration were not treated as a live pre-existing dispute because the award had already addressed them and no recognised challenge remained pending. The petition was also held to be duly authorised on the basis of the board resolution and power of attorney. Default was established through the debt, demand notice, non-payment, and arbitral award, so the petition was admitted and CIRP, including the statutory moratorium, was triggered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>