<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399561</link>
    <description>A challenge to the ECIR, arrest and remand under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 was raised before the Delhi HC, while the respondent objected that territorial jurisdiction and the proper forum lay in Mumbai. The petitioner invoked Article 226(2) of the Constitution and alleged non-compliance with Section 19(1) PMLA and the arrest and remand procedure under Chapter XII and Section 167 CrPC. A separate request for interim bail was pressed on medical grounds. Notice was issued on both matters, status reports were directed, and the questions of territorial jurisdiction and interim bail were left for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 535 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399561</link>
      <description>A challenge to the ECIR, arrest and remand under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 was raised before the Delhi HC, while the respondent objected that territorial jurisdiction and the proper forum lay in Mumbai. The petitioner invoked Article 226(2) of the Constitution and alleged non-compliance with Section 19(1) PMLA and the arrest and remand procedure under Chapter XII and Section 167 CrPC. A separate request for interim bail was pressed on medical grounds. Notice was issued on both matters, status reports were directed, and the questions of territorial jurisdiction and interim bail were left for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>