<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that a Single Member Bench has jurisdiction to adjudicate interest-related issues regardless of the amount involved, as Section 35D(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, does not explicitly exclude such matters. The Revenue&#039;s objections were dismissed, and the case was scheduled for a final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that a Single Member Bench has jurisdiction to adjudicate interest-related issues regardless of the amount involved, as Section 35D(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, does not explicitly exclude such matters. The Revenue&#039;s objections were dismissed, and the case was scheduled for a final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>