<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, focusing on the challenge to the reopening of assessment and the validity of the assessment order. The Tribunal held that the failure to provide reasons for reopening rendered the reassessment proceedings and order invalid, ultimately quashing them. The main grounds of appeal were not addressed due to the decision on the jurisdictional challenge. The appeal was concluded on 17.07.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, focusing on the challenge to the reopening of assessment and the validity of the assessment order. The Tribunal held that the failure to provide reasons for reopening rendered the reassessment proceedings and order invalid, ultimately quashing them. The main grounds of appeal were not addressed due to the decision on the jurisdictional challenge. The appeal was concluded on 17.07.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>