<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1235 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290746</link>
    <description>A debenture subscription arrangement was treated as financial debt because it created a creditor-debtor relationship with disbursal, repayment obligations, accrued interest, redemption premium and penal interest. Non-payment despite notices established default on the record. Objections based on privity of contract, alleged lack of board authority and stamp duty on the guarantee were rejected because the transaction authorised enforcement on default, the board resolution permitted institution of insolvency proceedings, and the stamp-duty challenge was inapplicable in the insolvency context. The section 7 application was found complete and admissible, leading to admission and commencement of CIRP with moratorium and appointment of an IRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=625028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1235 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290746</link>
      <description>A debenture subscription arrangement was treated as financial debt because it created a creditor-debtor relationship with disbursal, repayment obligations, accrued interest, redemption premium and penal interest. Non-payment despite notices established default on the record. Objections based on privity of contract, alleged lack of board authority and stamp duty on the guarantee were rejected because the transaction authorised enforcement on default, the board resolution permitted institution of insolvency proceedings, and the stamp-duty challenge was inapplicable in the insolvency context. The section 7 application was found complete and admissible, leading to admission and commencement of CIRP with moratorium and appointment of an IRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>