<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23502</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the reassessment under section 147(b) for the assessment year 1973-74, affirming the priority of unabsorbed depreciation and development rebate over the deduction under section 80J. The court found the reassessment based on the audit report proper, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge and ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23502</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the reassessment under section 147(b) for the assessment year 1973-74, affirming the priority of unabsorbed depreciation and development rebate over the deduction under section 80J. The court found the reassessment based on the audit report proper, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge and ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>