<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399541</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Tax Case Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to consider the genuineness of transactions based on consistent treatment and appropriate explanations provided by the assessee. The decision highlighted procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles, ultimately favoring the appellant based on principles of fairness and consistency in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399541</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Tax Case Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to consider the genuineness of transactions based on consistent treatment and appropriate explanations provided by the assessee. The decision highlighted procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles, ultimately favoring the appellant based on principles of fairness and consistency in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>