<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 512 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the reassessment order due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to address the objections raised by the assessee against the notice issued under Section 148, deeming the reassessment invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the additions made by the AO, including the disallowance of the loss in F&amp;amp;O trading and the alleged unaccounted commission. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the reassessment order was invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 512 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the reassessment order due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to address the objections raised by the assessee against the notice issued under Section 148, deeming the reassessment invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the additions made by the AO, including the disallowance of the loss in F&amp;amp;O trading and the alleged unaccounted commission. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the reassessment order was invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>