<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399533</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes by the Tribunal, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the expenditure for earning exempt income under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Tribunal excluded the period of lockdown from the limitation period for pronouncing the order, citing disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399533</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes by the Tribunal, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the expenditure for earning exempt income under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Tribunal excluded the period of lockdown from the limitation period for pronouncing the order, citing disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>