<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting the issues related to the TDR cost and valuation back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The disallowance of the refundable security deposit was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a pragmatic approach in interpreting time limits for orders, especially in light of the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting the issues related to the TDR cost and valuation back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The disallowance of the refundable security deposit was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a pragmatic approach in interpreting time limits for orders, especially in light of the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>