<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399526</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, affirming the legality of non-releasing the seized gold, validating the notices issued within the extended limitation period, and rejecting the request to drop the proceedings initiated under the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioner was instructed to respond to the show-cause notice for the adjudicating authority to make a decision. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399526</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, affirming the legality of non-releasing the seized gold, validating the notices issued within the extended limitation period, and rejecting the request to drop the proceedings initiated under the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioner was instructed to respond to the show-cause notice for the adjudicating authority to make a decision. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>