<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 499 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399525</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully argued a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of personal hearing and notice of the Show Cause Notice. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement limited to abetting the crime, reducing the penalty from Rs. 35 Lakhs to Rs. 5,00,000 as it was unclear if the appellant gained financially. The appeal was partially allowed, and the penalty was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 499 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399525</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully argued a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of personal hearing and notice of the Show Cause Notice. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement limited to abetting the crime, reducing the penalty from Rs. 35 Lakhs to Rs. 5,00,000 as it was unclear if the appellant gained financially. The appeal was partially allowed, and the penalty was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>