<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 490 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399516</link>
    <description>The tribunal admitted the application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, as the Operational Creditor met all statutory requirements, and the Corporate Debtor failed to raise a valid dispute within the required timeframe. A moratorium was imposed, an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed, and the Operational Creditor directed to deposit funds for IRP expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 490 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399516</link>
      <description>The tribunal admitted the application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, as the Operational Creditor met all statutory requirements, and the Corporate Debtor failed to raise a valid dispute within the required timeframe. A moratorium was imposed, an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed, and the Operational Creditor directed to deposit funds for IRP expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>