<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 484 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Sections 7 and 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, 2016, as it found a genuine dispute existed between the parties before the Demand Notice was issued. The decision was based on insufficient documentation to establish the default by the Corporate Debtor and the need for precise evidence to substantiate claims in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 484 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Sections 7 and 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, 2016, as it found a genuine dispute existed between the parties before the Demand Notice was issued. The decision was based on insufficient documentation to establish the default by the Corporate Debtor and the need for precise evidence to substantiate claims in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>