<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 469 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399495</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not quashed because the complaint contained the essential ingredients of cheque dishonour, including issuance, dishonour and statutory notice. The plea based on pending insolvency proceedings, prior instruction not to present the cheque and alleged coercion raised disputed questions of fact that could not be examined in a Section 482 CrPC petition. Those defences were left to be tested at trial, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 469 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399495</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not quashed because the complaint contained the essential ingredients of cheque dishonour, including issuance, dishonour and statutory notice. The plea based on pending insolvency proceedings, prior instruction not to present the cheque and alleged coercion raised disputed questions of fact that could not be examined in a Section 482 CrPC petition. Those defences were left to be tested at trial, and the prosecution was allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>