<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1687 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on warehousing and inspection services as the expenses for these services were included in the assessable value of the final products. The services were found to be used in relation to the manufacture and sale of goods, with charges borne by the appellant. The Tribunal distinguished a previous judgment and allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1687 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on warehousing and inspection services as the expenses for these services were included in the assessable value of the final products. The services were found to be used in relation to the manufacture and sale of goods, with charges borne by the appellant. The Tribunal distinguished a previous judgment and allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>