https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399490 The court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure and prohibition orders under the GST Act. It directed the provisional release of seized goods upon certain conditions, emphasizing economic revival post-pandemic. The court highlighted the need for a valid reason to believe for inspection, search, and seizure actions under Section 67 of the GST Act. While refraining from quashing the seizure order, it modified the prohibition order and allowed for future adjudication proceedings without awarding costs. The case was closed with no further costs imposed. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399490 The court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure and prohibition orders under the GST Act. It directed the provisional release of seized goods upon certain conditions, emphasizing economic revival post-pandemic. The court highlighted the need for a valid reason to believe for inspection, search, and seizure actions under Section 67 of the GST Act. While refraining from quashing the seizure order, it modified the prohibition order and allowed for future adjudication proceedings without awarding costs. The case was closed with no further costs imposed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399490