<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the addition of cash found during the search as the assessee failed to prove it belonged to the trust. Regarding the jewellery, the Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication by the AO to clarify ownership of jewellery found at different locations. The importance of establishing ownership and sources of cash and jewellery during search operations under the Income-tax Act was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the addition of cash found during the search as the assessee failed to prove it belonged to the trust. Regarding the jewellery, the Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication by the AO to clarify ownership of jewellery found at different locations. The importance of establishing ownership and sources of cash and jewellery during search operations under the Income-tax Act was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>