<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399465</link>
    <description>Maintenance and common expense contributions collected by a co-operative housing society from its members were held not to constitute taxable club or association services, because the levy requires a service relationship between distinct persons and the society&#039;s receipts were for common upkeep under its bye-laws. Applying mutuality, the contributions did not satisfy the definition of &quot;service&quot; under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, and the explanation to that provision did not change the result on these facts. Following the society&#039;s earlier identical case, the tax paid was held refundable and consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399465</link>
      <description>Maintenance and common expense contributions collected by a co-operative housing society from its members were held not to constitute taxable club or association services, because the levy requires a service relationship between distinct persons and the society&#039;s receipts were for common upkeep under its bye-laws. Applying mutuality, the contributions did not satisfy the definition of &quot;service&quot; under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, and the explanation to that provision did not change the result on these facts. Following the society&#039;s earlier identical case, the tax paid was held refundable and consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>