https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399463 The Tribunal held that the demand against the Appellant was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. Emphasizing the regular audit of transactions and the absence of objections by the Central Excise Department, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the Appellant's appeal with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:04:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399463 The Tribunal held that the demand against the Appellant was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. Emphasizing the regular audit of transactions and the absence of objections by the Central Excise Department, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the Appellant's appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399463