<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1802 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the loan received by the assessee from M/s. OAT System Software India Private Limited did not qualify as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the allowance of interest paid on the loan as a business expenditure. The judgment was delivered on November 30, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1802 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the loan received by the assessee from M/s. OAT System Software India Private Limited did not qualify as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the allowance of interest paid on the loan as a business expenditure. The judgment was delivered on November 30, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>