<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1822 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290697</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s classification as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, which determined its principal object of providing agricultural credit. The ITAT found the Revenue&#039;s invocation of section 80P(4) inappropriate and distinguished a previous judgment cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the timing and context. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1822 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290697</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s classification as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, which determined its principal object of providing agricultural credit. The ITAT found the Revenue&#039;s invocation of section 80P(4) inappropriate and distinguished a previous judgment cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the timing and context. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>