https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399458 The Delhi High Court, through a judgment by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, directed the respondent to supply photocopies of seized documents to the petitioner in a writ petition. The Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV was instructed to provide the photocopies after a meeting with the petitioner or their representative. The petitioner was required to furnish a list of needed documents, and the photocopies were to be provided at their expense within three working days. This decision underscores the importance of timely document access in legal proceedings and promotes efficiency and cooperation between the parties. en-us Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399458 The Delhi High Court, through a judgment by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, directed the respondent to supply photocopies of seized documents to the petitioner in a writ petition. The Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV was instructed to provide the photocopies after a meeting with the petitioner or their representative. The petitioner was required to furnish a list of needed documents, and the photocopies were to be provided at their expense within three working days. This decision underscores the importance of timely document access in legal proceedings and promotes efficiency and cooperation between the parties. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399458