https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399456 The court directed the 2nd respondent to decide on the representation regarding a GST grievance after providing a hearing to the petitioner within two months, allowing for a virtual hearing due to the Covid-19 situation. The court emphasized compliance with the law and noted the absence of prima facie proof of receipt of the representation. The writ petition was disposed of without commenting on the merits, ensuring the petitioner's opportunity for a hearing as per legal requirements. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399456 The court directed the 2nd respondent to decide on the representation regarding a GST grievance after providing a hearing to the petitioner within two months, allowing for a virtual hearing due to the Covid-19 situation. The court emphasized compliance with the law and noted the absence of prima facie proof of receipt of the representation. The writ petition was disposed of without commenting on the merits, ensuring the petitioner's opportunity for a hearing as per legal requirements. Case-Laws GST Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399456