<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 409 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399435</link>
    <description>Eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) must be tested on a factual enquiry into the society&#039;s actual activities for the relevant year, including the purpose of each loan transaction, and not merely on its co-operative registration or certificate. After the Full Bench ruling in Mavilayi, a denial of deduction cannot rest on classification alone, and Section 80P(4) requires examination of the real nature of the assessee-society&#039;s business. A bare reference to a limited agricultural component, without verifying the underlying lending activity, is insufficient. The matter was therefore restored for fresh factual adjudication, with the assessee succeeding to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:51:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 409 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399435</link>
      <description>Eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) must be tested on a factual enquiry into the society&#039;s actual activities for the relevant year, including the purpose of each loan transaction, and not merely on its co-operative registration or certificate. After the Full Bench ruling in Mavilayi, a denial of deduction cannot rest on classification alone, and Section 80P(4) requires examination of the real nature of the assessee-society&#039;s business. A bare reference to a limited agricultural component, without verifying the underlying lending activity, is insufficient. The matter was therefore restored for fresh factual adjudication, with the assessee succeeding to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>