<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 26 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23469</link>
    <description>Administrative circulars issued by the competent authority under a taxing statute are binding on subordinate assessing officers in its administration. Applying section 17(5) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act and the settled approach to circulars under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner&#039;s instruction had to be followed even if it went beyond a strict legal construction. Because the circular expressly covered pending assessments, the assessing authorities were required to give effect to it, and surcharge could not be levied in those pending matters. The impugned levy was therefore unsustainable to that extent and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 26 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23469</link>
      <description>Administrative circulars issued by the competent authority under a taxing statute are binding on subordinate assessing officers in its administration. Applying section 17(5) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act and the settled approach to circulars under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner&#039;s instruction had to be followed even if it went beyond a strict legal construction. Because the circular expressly covered pending assessments, the assessing authorities were required to give effect to it, and surcharge could not be levied in those pending matters. The impugned levy was therefore unsustainable to that extent and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>