<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 26 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23468</link>
    <description>A declaration under the Amnesty Scheme gives immunity only to the declarant for income actually belonging to that person; it does not bar tax from examining, in another assessee&#039;s assessment, whether credits in its books are in fact unexplained income. The statutory fiction created by the Scheme is limited and cannot override enquiry under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee-firm may still establish before the Assessing Officer that the credits were genuine deposits of the named persons and not its own undisclosed income. Accordingly, a notice under section 143(2) was not without jurisdiction merely because the amounts had earlier been declared and taxed under the Amnesty Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 26 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23468</link>
      <description>A declaration under the Amnesty Scheme gives immunity only to the declarant for income actually belonging to that person; it does not bar tax from examining, in another assessee&#039;s assessment, whether credits in its books are in fact unexplained income. The statutory fiction created by the Scheme is limited and cannot override enquiry under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee-firm may still establish before the Assessing Officer that the credits were genuine deposits of the named persons and not its own undisclosed income. Accordingly, a notice under section 143(2) was not without jurisdiction merely because the amounts had earlier been declared and taxed under the Amnesty Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>