<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order-in-original allowing the respondent-assessee to avail cenvat credit on power generated and transferred to their sister concern, following precedent that credit on input services used in electricity generation for sister units producing dutiable goods is permissible. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, along with the Cross-objection by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order-in-original allowing the respondent-assessee to avail cenvat credit on power generated and transferred to their sister concern, following precedent that credit on input services used in electricity generation for sister units producing dutiable goods is permissible. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, along with the Cross-objection by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>