<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1885 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) is not applicable for expenses with improper TDS rates or short deduction of TDS if the tax was deducted and paid within the specified time. The decision emphasized that disallowance is only justified in cases of non-deduction or delayed payment of TDS, not for minor discrepancies in deduction rates. The judgment clarified the interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1885 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) is not applicable for expenses with improper TDS rates or short deduction of TDS if the tax was deducted and paid within the specified time. The decision emphasized that disallowance is only justified in cases of non-deduction or delayed payment of TDS, not for minor discrepancies in deduction rates. The judgment clarified the interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>