<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1807 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290681</link>
    <description>Counsel stated that he had no instructions to pursue the appeal and sought permission to withdraw the vakalatnama, which was granted. As no one appeared to press the matter, the Securities Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1807 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290681</link>
      <description>Counsel stated that he had no instructions to pursue the appeal and sought permission to withdraw the vakalatnama, which was granted. As no one appeared to press the matter, the Securities Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>