https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290691 The Supreme Court found non-compliance with its previous orders by a group of companies and co-promoters, expressing dissatisfaction with evasion attempts. It criticized the Government committee's interference in a sub judice matter and froze bank accounts and properties due to fund diversion. Directors' bank accounts were frozen, and personal properties attached, with restrictions on transactions without court approval. The court hinted at potential criminal breach of trust, seeking Chartered Accountants' details and Amrapali group's presence for ongoing compliance monitoring and further actions. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:33:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290691 The Supreme Court found non-compliance with its previous orders by a group of companies and co-promoters, expressing dissatisfaction with evasion attempts. It criticized the Government committee's interference in a sub judice matter and froze bank accounts and properties due to fund diversion. Directors' bank accounts were frozen, and personal properties attached, with restrictions on transactions without court approval. The court hinted at potential criminal breach of trust, seeking Chartered Accountants' details and Amrapali group's presence for ongoing compliance monitoring and further actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290691