<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399397</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi declined to interfere with the inquiry letter dated 29th July, 2019 but agreed to review the legality of the Explanation to Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act in conjunction with similar writ petitions. The Court permitted the respondents to submit their counter-affidavits within four weeks and scheduled the matter for further hearing on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=624602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399397</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi declined to interfere with the inquiry letter dated 29th July, 2019 but agreed to review the legality of the Explanation to Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act in conjunction with similar writ petitions. The Court permitted the respondents to submit their counter-affidavits within four weeks and scheduled the matter for further hearing on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>