https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23459 The Delhi HC directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions arising from expenditure on the Indonesia project, the character of the loss on the dehumidification plant, and entertainment expenditure. It noted that the Indonesia project issue had already been directed for reference in another assessment year, and the entertainment expenditure issue was also referable consistently with the earlier year. The alleged loss of Rs. 3,20,213 from the dehumidification plant was treated as a mixed question of law and fact and was considered fit for reference, with the question reframed to ask whether it was a revenue loss. en-us Mon, 07 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:57:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23459 The Delhi HC directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions arising from expenditure on the Indonesia project, the character of the loss on the dehumidification plant, and entertainment expenditure. It noted that the Indonesia project issue had already been directed for reference in another assessment year, and the entertainment expenditure issue was also referable consistently with the earlier year. The alleged loss of Rs. 3,20,213 from the dehumidification plant was treated as a mixed question of law and fact and was considered fit for reference, with the question reframed to ask whether it was a revenue loss. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 07 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23459