https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399366 The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the legality of the inspection ordered under Section 206 and the validity of the summons issued under Section 207(3)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 by the Registrar of Companies. The court found the actions taken by the ROC to investigate allegations of mismanagement and fraudulent activities within the company were valid and within statutory powers. Additionally, the court determined that the ROC's parallel proceedings were permissible despite similar issues pending before the NCLT, as the scope and purpose of the inquiries differed. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:59:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399366 The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the legality of the inspection ordered under Section 206 and the validity of the summons issued under Section 207(3)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 by the Registrar of Companies. The court found the actions taken by the ROC to investigate allegations of mismanagement and fraudulent activities within the company were valid and within statutory powers. Additionally, the court determined that the ROC's parallel proceedings were permissible despite similar issues pending before the NCLT, as the scope and purpose of the inquiries differed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399366