https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399360 The court found that the application for rectification of a clerical error in a previous judgment, which omitted a respondent's name, was not maintainable as the matter had been confirmed by higher courts. Despite recognizing a possible typographical error, the court emphasized the need for permission from appellate forums before altering the order. The court rejected the application but granted liberty to seek relief from higher forums for any necessary modifications. en-us Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:48:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399360 The court found that the application for rectification of a clerical error in a previous judgment, which omitted a respondent's name, was not maintainable as the matter had been confirmed by higher courts. Despite recognizing a possible typographical error, the court emphasized the need for permission from appellate forums before altering the order. The court rejected the application but granted liberty to seek relief from higher forums for any necessary modifications. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399360